Case Details

Filings (688) Data Requests (10)Public Comments (52) Active Party and Notification List (36) Assigned Staff (8)

Item No.	Date Filed	Description Of Filing	Filing Party	Filed By	No of Attachments	Deleted Filings
690	1/26/2016	Decision of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court Affirming December 19, 2014 Commission Order	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	1
689	7/14/2015	Law Court Reply Brief - Friedman	McGlauflin, Bruce	McGlauflin, Bruce	1
688	7/14/2015	Law Court Reply Brief of Appellant Ed Friedman	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	1
687	6/30/2015	Law Court Brief of Appellee CMP	CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY	Regulatory Administration, Debra Mills -Use This One-	1
686	6/30/2015	Law Court Brief of Appellee MPUC	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	1
685	5/12/2015	Law Court Brief of Appellant Ed Friedman	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	1
684	3/20/2015	OPA Letter Regarding Briefing	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	1
683	3/19/2015	Law Court Briefing Schedule	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	1
682	2/10/2015	Letter to PUC	McGlauflin, Bruce	McGlauflin, Bruce	3
681	2/9/2015	Law Court Scheduling Order	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	COMMISSION STAFF, CMS	1

Per Page

1 of 69 First Prev Next Last Go To

View By Set	View By Question

DR Set ID	Set Description	Issue Date	No. of DR Questions	Propounded Upon	View Questions in Set	View Cover Letter/Instructions
-001	FR DR No. 1 to OPA	2/11/2013	8	OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE	View Questions
-002	Third Set of Data Requests to CMP from Friedman, et al	4/29/2013	28	CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY	View Questions	View
CMP-001	CMP-01-01	2/8/2013	1	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions
CMP-002	CMP's First Data Request to the Complainants (REVISED)	2/11/2013	1	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions
CMP-003	CMP's Data Request No. 3 to the Complaintant's witness Hardell	2/12/2013	20	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions
CMP-004	CMP Data Request No. 4 to the Complainant Witness Li	2/12/2013	3	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions
CMP-005	CMP Data Request No. 5 to the Complainant Witness Phillips	2/12/2013	9	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions
CMP-006	CMP's Data Request No. 6 to Complainant Witness Kumar	2/12/2013	10	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions
CMP-007	CMP Data Request No. 7 to Complainant's Witness Carpenter	2/12/2013	29	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions
CMP-008	CMP Data Request No. 8 to Complainant's Witness Rea	2/12/2013	13	FRIEDMAN ET AL	View Questions

Posted By	Posted Date	Comments	Attachment(s)
Christopher and Janet Crosman 20 Hyler Street Thomaston, Maine 04861 Email ID: chris.b.crosman@gmail.com	11/14/2019	Public comments Attached.	2011-00262 Public Comment.pdf
Ed Friedman 42 Stevens Rd. Bowdoinham, ME04008 Email ID:edfomb@comcast.net Phone No. :207-666-3372	9/15/2014	New paper: Impact of Wireless Technologies on Children by Ronald Powell, PhD.	Impact of Wireless Technology on Children.pdf
Ed Friedman 42 Stevens Rd. Bowdoinham, ME04008 Email ID:edfomb@comcast.net Phone No. :207-666-3372	4/20/2014	New report by industry consultant shows smart meter RF conducted on household wiring. Links to report and hopefully video below from Michele Hertz: In 2009, when I first learned that I had been injured by the radiation emissions from "smart" AMR meters, I began to research, document and report about these meters. It seemed to me that there was something terribly wrong with the meters but at the time, I had no idea what it was. My research led me to 2 amazing scientists who both told me about the switch mode power supply in smart meters and that it was contaminating the wiring with pulsed RF radiation. It made sense, especially because one of the meters I was exposed to was 150 feet away from my house. Dr. Milham was one of the scientists I spoke to. The other one does not discuss this publicly so I am respecting his privacy. Since that time Stop Smart Meters NY, my group in NY, hired an RF engineer to investigate the RF on the wiring from smart meters. We actually hired a true but very honorable industry expert. With this expert we investigated the conducted RF radiation from smart meters. He used special equipment and he found that the very specific pulsed RF/MW radiation from the smart meter was conducting on to the electrical wiring in the home we measured. Here is the report and please see the last page to learn how stupid the FCC part 15 testing was for these meters. http://stopsmartmetersny.org/images/Report_on_Examination_of_Selected_Sources_of_Electromagnetic_Fields_at_Selected_Residences_20140301.pdf Basically, the untested electronic components, inside these faulty meters, are conducting a range of extreme pulsed RF frequencies and contaminating whole electrical distribution systems in homes and building and turning home/building wiring (and other metal conductors) into giant pulsed RF and microwave transmitters! Video of home visit at below link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuIWjLhMvh8&feature=em-share_video_user
Ed Friedman 42 Stevens Rd. Bowdoinham, ME04008 Email ID:edfomb@comcast.net Phone No. :207-666-3372	4/19/2014	Entire Comment from Kit Weaver is attached as PDF. Excerpt below on recently released SCENIHR Report: These criteria are inconsistent with a review that is titled `Possible Effects?. Further, the approach in judging the emerging evidence is inconsistent with the charter of the Scientific Committee to give advice needed for `consumer safety, public health and the environment on new or emerging problems.? Some statements acknowledge important new evidence of effect; yet then shift the burden of proof to a higher level requiring that adverse health effect, a known mechanism, a causal level of evidence be conclusively demonstrated, or physical evidence of harm be demonstrated. There is nothing in the report that says the authors were directed to provide proof of effect (or consistent indications, or consistent demonstration of effect; or consistent support for, or certainty of effects) at levels below ICNIRP limits. With the same flawed approach in drawing conclusions from emerging science as demonstrated by the SCENIHR, hardly any environmental or occupational condition would be qualified as an emerging or newly identified health risk. ? There is a serious consequence which comes from dismissing effects linking EMF/RFR exposures reported in scientific studies to an `all or none? finding by using embedded criteria that demand `causal? or `conclusive? or `definitive? or `consistent demonstration of effect?. It is clear that such erasing possible impacts of great global health consequence will chill public health responses that would otherwise occur if the correct standards for judging the evidence were used in this Opinion. Public health activities hinge on not causality but sufficiency of evidence to warrant a proportionate preventative action in line with established precautionary principles. This draft Opinion provides no guidance in this area.? [emphasis added]
Ed Friedman 42 Stevens Rd. Bowdoinham, ME04008 Email ID:edfomb@comcast.net Phone No. :207-666-3372	3/24/2014	Subject: DOI Cites FCC EMR Guidelines as Outdated and Inapplicable: Letter from Dept of Interior to National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1) Feb 7th, 2014 One thing is clear from the EMF bird study below: The Department of the Interior really criticized the FCC EMR guidelines which CMP, Texas, VT and many others continue to cite in their echo chamber of errors. If we say it enough times, it must be so, science be damned. However, the electromagnetic radiation standards used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continue to be based on thermal heating, a criterion now nearly 30 years out of date and inapplicable today. For a federal agency to say something that harsh about another federal agency is shocking. Will PUC?s listen? It is not just independent scientists saying this. (1)The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), located within the Department of Commerce, is the Executive Branch agency that is principally responsible by law for advising the President on telecommunications and information policy issues. See letter at this link and attached as a PDF in Enclosure A. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf The second significant issue associated with communication towers involves impacts from non- ionizing electromagnetic radiation emitted by these structures... However, the electromagnetic radiation standards used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continue to be based on thermal heating, a criterion now nearly 30 years out of date and inapplicable today. This is primarily due to the lower levels of radiation output from microwave-powered communication devices such as cellular telephones and other sources of point-to-point communications; levels typically lower than from microwave ovens. The problem, however, appears to focus on very low levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation.	us_doi_comments 2-7-14.pdf
R Beavers Maine Email ID: rbbeavers@comcast.net	3/11/2014	From: Bobbi Beavers [mailto:] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 8:40 AM Subject: Fwd: Maryland delegates criticize BGE smart meter opt-out fees \| Politics - WBAL Home FYI Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: http://www.wbaltv.com/politics/md-delegate-to-challenge-bge-smart-meters-fees/24794032 A bill banning smart meter opt-out fees now has bipartisan support in Maryland.
Jennifer Robbins Appleton, ME	2/19/2014	Yet another study from a very reliable source reaching the same conclusion about mobile phones: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10636197/Mobile-phones-pose-no-health-risk-according-to-report.html This UK agency even assures, through an independent committee, that there is no "industry influence" on the agency's studies. There has yet to be a single government study anywhere in the world finding that smart meters or long-term cell phone use is harmful. Will Maine be the first?
Ed Friedman 42 Stevens Rd. Bowdoinham, ME04008 Email ID:edfomb@comcast.net Phone No. :207-666-3372	2/12/2014	Largest MA Utility says AMI a bad idea. Their comments attached.	Mass Utilty comments-2-10-14.pdf
Rep Roberta Beavers Maine Email ID: rbeavers@comcast.net	1/29/2014	Comments attached.	Please place Rep.docx
Frank D Slason 774 Colby Road Somerville, ME4348	1/14/2014	Public Comments	image9675.pdf

Per Page

1 of 6 First Prev Next Last Go To

Notification List Active Party List

Name of Person/Company	Representing Company	Mailing Address	Email/Phone/Fax
Barris, Elizabeth		1625 Sycamore Drive Topanga CA 90404	Email ID: elizabethbarris@aol.com Phone Extn: 0 Fax:
Boland, Andrea			Email ID: sixwings@metrocast.net Phone Fax:
Boxer, Elisa		16 Minuteman Drive SCARBOROUGH ME 04074	Email ID: boxerelisa@gmail.com Phone Fax:
Boyd, Michael E.	CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC. (CARE)	5439 Soquel Drive Soquel CA 95073	Email ID: michaelboyd@sbcglobal.net Phone Ph: 408-891-9677 Fax:
Brook, Autumn	N/A	39 Cathance Farm Lane other Bowdoin ME 04287	Email ID: autumn279@live.com Phone Ph: 207-837-2582 Fax: Fax: 207-666-8916
des Rosiers, Jared S.	CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY	Merrill's Wharf 254 Commercial Street Portland ME 04101	Email ID: jdesrosiers@pierceatwood.com Phone Ph: 207-791-1390 Fax: Fax: 207-791-1350
Duncklee, Luke		83 Edison Drive Augusta ME 04336	Email ID: luke.duncklee@cmpco.com Phone Ph: 207-623-3521 Extn: 2418 Fax:
Dunn, William	INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WOKERS LOCAL 1837	16 Old Winthrop Rd Manchester ME 04351	Email ID: bdunn@ibew1837.org Phone Ph: 207-623-1030 Extn: 13 Fax:
Edwards, Jane		335 Main St. Vassalboro ME 04989	Email ID: jeewhiz@roadrunner.com Phone Fax:
Evrard, John		30 Thomas Street Camden ME 04843 4324	Email ID: johnsmisc@roadrunner.com Phone Fax:

Per Page

1 of 4 First Prev Next Last Go To

Staff Name	Role
Davidson, Derek	Staff Analyst
FORTIN, ETHELYN	Support Staff
Huntington, Faith	Staff Analyst
McColman, Jordan	Staff Analyst
Morancie, Stephani	Staff Analyst
Raber, Leslie	Staff Analyst
Shejen, Beverly	Support Staff
Tannenbaum, Mitchell	Hearing Examiner

Per Page

1 of 1 First Prev Next Last Go To